Hubungan Open Access Institutional Repository (OAIR) dengan Produktivitas Ilmiah pada Dosen di Perguruan Tinggi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37014/medpus.v26i4.662Keywords:
Open Access Institutional Repository (OAIR), Availability, Accessibility, Scientific ProductivityAbstract
OA becomes a new model in the scientific communication process. In various studies show that OA gives the impact of increasing research by giving free access to articles for all who are interested. The OA movement is not only limited to the process of disseminating and promoting work from the research community, but has evolved into individual institutional repositories, electronic archives of research results of staff working on these institutions. Some academic libraries have begun to develop Open Access Institutional Repositories (OAIR). Along with the development of OAIR, the academic community is demanded to be productive in conducting scientific publications. The development of OAIR and scientific publications are very important components in scientific communication. This study aims to determine whether there is a relationship between the availability and accessibility of OAIR with the scientific productivity of lecturers. The method used in this research is descriptive quantitative. The number of respondents was 70 lecturers from 3 universities who presented the 2018 SINTA Awards, namely the University of Indonesia, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati and the Ministry of Health II Jakarta Poltekkes. Data collection is done by using questionnaires in the form of online and offline. The results of this study indicate that the availability and accessibility of the OAIR system has a multiple correlation coefficient of 0.812 and a significance value of 0,000, so there is a positive influence and has a very strong relationship on scientific productivity among lecturers.References
Arikunto, S. (2006). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Bumi Aksara: Jakarta.
Association of Research Libraries. (t.thn.). Focus Area: Scholarly Communication. Diambil kembali dari Association of Research Libraries Website: http://www.arl.org/focus-areas/scholarly- communication#.W0dQ2NUzbIU
Buehler, M. (2013). Institutional repository impact and value proposition. In M. Buehler, Demystifying the Institutional Repository for Success (pp. 177-200). Cambridge: Chandos.
Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002). Read the Budapest Open Access Initiative. Diambil 26 November 2018, dari https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read
Clifford, Bolanle Ishola & Olurotimi. (2014). Availability, Access to and Level of Use of Academic Library Information Resources; Study of Selected Academic Libraries in South-Western Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice Vol.5, No.28, 2014
Cullen, R., & Chawner, B. (2011). Institutional Repositories, Open Access, and Scholarly Communication: A Study of Conflicting Paradigms. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(6), 460"“470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2011.07.002
Ezema, I. J. (2011). Building open access institutional repositories for global visibility of Nigerian scholarly publication. Library Review, 473-485.
Farida, I., Tjakraatmadja, J. H., Aries Firman, & Sulistyo-Basuki. (2014). A conceptual model of Open Access Institutional Repository in Indonesia academic libraries: Viewed from knowledge management perspective. Library Management, 168-181.
Harliansyah, F. (2017). Institutional Repository sebagai Sarana Komunikasi Ilmiah yang Sustainable dan Reliable (hal. 1"“8).
Kementerian Riset Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi. (2018, Juli 04). Siaran Pers: Direktorat Jenderal Penguatan Riset dan Pengembangan Kementerian Riset Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi.
Diambil kembali dari Kementerian Riset Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi: https://ristekdikti.go.id/penghargaan-sinta-awards-tahun-2018/
Lee, J., Burnett, G., Vandegrift, M., State, F., & Way, H. (2015). Availability and accessibility in an open access institutional repository : a case study. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 20 (1).
Minishi-majanja, M. K. (2011). (UTAUT) model in open access adoption studies The suitability of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model in open access adoption studies. Article Information, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666910385375
Morisson. (2017). Metode Penelitian Survei. Jakarta: Kencana.
Nazir. (1999). Metodologi Penelitian, cetakan keempat. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Notoatmodjo, Soekidjo.(2012). Metodologi Penelitian Kesehatan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Nwachukwu, V.N, Lucky, Abdulsalami & Salami, Paulina F. (2014). Availability, Accessibility and Use of Information Resources and Services among Information Seekers of Lafia Public Library in Nasarawa State. Information and Knowledge Management Vol.4, No.10, 2014
Priyanto, I. F. (2015). Readiness Of Indonesian Academic Libraries For Open Access And Open Access Repositories Implementation: A Study On Indonesian Open Access Repositories Registered In OpenDOAR. United States: University of North Texas.
Singarimbun, Masri dan Effendi, Sofyan. (1995). Metode Penelitian Survey. Penerbit: LP3ES, Jakarta Sugiyono. (2004). Metode Penelitian Bisnis,Cetakan Kesebelas, Bandung: CV. ALFABETA Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif dan &B, Bandung: CV.ALFABETA
Umar, Husein. (2011). Metode Penelitian Untuk Skripsi dan Tesis Bisnis Edisi 11. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada
Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, (May).
Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang. (t.thn.). Program Penelitian : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang. Diambil kembali dari Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang website: http://dp2m.umm.ac.id/id/pages/program-penelitian/program-penelitian-20.html
Virgil, Diodato. (2013). Dictionary of Bibliometrics. New York: The Haworth Press, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203714133 diakses pada 23 Desember 2019
Yusuf, A. M. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan Penelitian Gabungan. Jakarta: Kencana
