Penerapan Knowledge Sharing Pada Sektor Publik
Perspektif Bibliometrik
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37014/medpus.v31i1.5178Keywords:
knowledge sharing, public sector, VOSviewer, bibliometricAbstract
This study aims to investigate the research dynamics related to the Application of Knowledge Sharing in the Public Sector. The study was conducted in December 2023 by searching the Scopus database with the keywords "knowledge sharing" and "public sector". The search results were analyzed and processed using the VOSViewer application program to identify the bibliometric map of the development of research in the field of knowledge sharing in the public sector. The results show that the number of research publications in the field of knowledge sharing in the public sector on Scopus from 2019 to 2023 has experienced a significant increase and has been most published in the VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems. Knowledge Sharing research in the Indonesian public sector is considered less popular. The most productive researcher in publishing research results is Sreejith Balasubramanian, affiliated with Middlesex University Dubai. Through network visualization, it shows that the research development map regarding knowledge sharing in the public sector is divided into 6 clusters. Cluster 1 consists of 15 topics, cluster 2 consists of 14 topics, cluster 3 consists of 12 topics, cluster 4 consists of 12 topics, cluster 5 consists of 10 topics, and cluster 6 consists of 5 topics. Research related to this topic in Indonesia is still focused on business, management, and accounting subjects in several institutions, with collaboration between researchers that needs to be improved.References
Agrifoglio, R., Metallo, C., & di Nauta, P. (2021). Understanding knowledge management in public organizations through the organizational knowing perspective: a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Public Organization Review, 21(1), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-020-00480-7
Al Yami, M., Ajmal, M. M., & Balasubramanian, S. (2021). Does size matter? The effects of public sector organizational size’ on knowledge management processes and operational efficiency. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-07-2020-0123
Ali, N., Mustaffa, M. M., Alkawsi, G., & Capretz, L. F. (2024). If you build it, will they come? Exploring the success factors of knowledge management systems in the Malaysian public sector. Heliyon, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27093
Ali, P. M. N., Malik, B. A., & Raza, A. (2018). Bibliometric analysis of literature on knowledge sharing. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 65(4), 217–227.
Amber, Q., Qazi, A. B., Javaid, N., Khan, I. A., & Ahmad, M. (2022). Knowledge sharing in public organizations in Pakistan: leaders’ ethical role and psychological capital of employees. Information Discovery and Delivery, 50(1), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-11-2020-0148
Bartlett, J. A. (2021). Knowledge management: A practical guide for librarians. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Bos-Nehles, A., Bondarouk, T., & Nijenhuis, K. (2017). Innovative work behaviour in knowledge-intensive public sector organizations: the case of supervisors in the Netherlands fire services. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(2), 379–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1244894
de Bem Machado, A., Secinaro, S., Calandra, D., & Lanzalonga, F. (2022). Knowledge management and digital transformation for Industry 4.0: a structured literature review. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 20(2), 320–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2021.2015261
Demir, A., Budur, T., Omer, H. M., & Heshmati, A. (2023). Links between knowledge management and organisational sustainability: does the ISO 9001 certification have an effect? Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 21(1), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2020.1860663
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Fauzi, M. A., Nguyen, M., & Malik, A. (2024). Knowledge sharing and theory of planned behavior: a bibliometric analysis. Journal of Knowledge Management, 28(2), 293–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2022-0933
Han, Y., Yang, Y., & Mohamed, R. (2023). A bibliometric analysis of work engagement in the hospitality and tourism industry. In Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights (Vol. 6, Issue 5, pp. 1946–1966). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTI-06-2022-0235
Lartey, P. Y., Kong, Y., Afriyie, S. O., Santosh, R. J., & Bah, F. B. M. (2021). Knowledge Management Issues in India: A Public Sector Perspective. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(3), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1676778
Mcevoy, P., Ragab, M. A., & Arisha, A. (2017). Review on the KM Applications in Public Organisations. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 15, 37.
Ononye, U. (2022). Linking tacit knowledge sharing to employee innovation with job thriving as a mediational factor: A public sector perspective. International Journal of Public Policy and Administration Research, 9(2), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.18488/74.v9i2.3022
Umar, M., Sial, M. H., Ali, S. A., Bari, M. W., & Ahmad, M. (2023). Trust and social network to boost tacit knowledge sharing with mediation of commitment: does culture moderate? VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 53(6), 1135–1158. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-01-2021-0012
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2023). VOSviewer manual version 1-6-19. Univeristeit Leiden, January, 54. http://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.1.pdf
Zupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
