Pemahaman dan Kesiapan Pustakawan terhadap Pemanfaatan Alat Klasifikasi di Era Digital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37014/medpus.v29i3.3468Keywords:
understanding, readiness, librarian, cataloging and classification, cataloging and classification toolsAbstract
Cataloging and classification is a major factor in the process of retrieval of information sources. Implementation of cataloging and classification requires reliable librarian competence. In this digital era, librarians are given many choices. Each librarian has strategy in carrying out classification activities, but still adhere to the principle of consistency and ease in the retrieval process. This study aims to provide an overview of the understanding and readiness of academic librarians in East Java state universities for classification tools in the digital era; as well as to know what classification tools are used by academic librarians of public universities in East Java in help their duties. The primary research data were obtained from interviews with 8 librarians in the classification section of East Java state university libraries, namely UNAIR, ITS, UNESA, UPN, UB, UM, UNEJ, and UTM. The method used descriptive qualitative approach. The results of the study show that most of the informants understand the existence of classification tools in the digital era. They know and implement these tools in their work. Most of the informants used the printed DDC as a classification tool in this era, even though they aware of online or digital classification tools. The printed DDC is believed to be reliable and trusted classification tool. Even so, there were informants who knew and understood the existence of a classification tool, but didn’t use it for reasons of inadequate supporting facilities. Most of the informants felt helped by the classification tools in online or digital form.References
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom"™s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. 302. https://www.pdfdrive.com/a-taxonomy-for-learning-teaching-and-assessing-a-revision-of-blooms-taxonomy-of-educational-objectives-d187836328.html
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., E. J. Furst, W. H. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives : The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I Cognitive Domain. Longmans, Green and Co.
Cabonero, D. A., & Dolendo, R. B. (2013). Cataloging and classification skills of library and information science practitioners in their workplaces: A case analysis. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2013.
Calhoun, K. (2006). The changing nature of the catalog and its integration with other discovery tools: prepared for the Library of Congress. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/calhoun-report-final.pdf
Coyle, K., & Hillmann, D. (2007). Cataloging rules for the 20th century. D-Lib Magazine, 13(1"“2). https://doi.org/10.1045/JANUARY2007-COYLE
Egbailenamhe, D., & Japhet, A. (2014). Issues, benefits and challenges of original cataloguing versus copy cataloguing: The experience at the Lagos State University. International Journal of Library and Information Science, 6(5), 88"“97. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJLIS2013.0416
Ejedafiru, E. F. (2010). Lack of ICT infrastructure as a Barrier to resource sharing in Nigerian libraries. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2010(SEPTEMBER), 1"“4.
Gaur, K. (2013). Knowledge Organization : Classification and Cataloguing Theory. 278.
Himayah. (2014). Melatih kataloger di era teknologi informasi. Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Kearsipan Khizanah Al-Hikmah, 2(2), 99"“108.
Larsgaard, M. (2015). Cataloguing and classification. In Information sources in cartography. https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.54n2.90
Mason, M. K. (2004). Automation: Has it Deprofessionalized the Work of Cataloguing Librarians? https://www.moyak.com/papers/automating-cataloguing.html
Masouleh, Z. D., Allahyari, M. S., & Atani, R. E. (2014). Operational indicators for measuring organizational e-readiness based on fuzzy logic: A challenge in the Agricultural Organization of Guilan Province, Iran. Information Processing in Agriculture, 1(2), 115"“123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2014.11.002
Mutula, S. M. & van Brakel, P. (2007). E-readiness of SMEs in the ICT sector in Botswana with respect to information access. Electronic library, 24(3), 402-417.
Parasuraman, A., & Colby, C. L. (2001). How and why your customers adopt technology. Techno Ready marketing. The Free Press.
Pruiiit, D. G. (2015). The Evolution of Readiness Theory. In Metadata of the chapter that will be visualized online. Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
Sarojadevi, K., & Padmamma, S. (2015). Digital Resource Management Strategies. In Handbook of Research on Inventive Digital Tools for Collection Management and Development in Modern Libraries (hal. 12). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8178-1.ch007
Slameto. (2010). Belajar dan faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. PT. Rineka Cipta.
Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sukmadinata, N. S. (2011). Pengembangan Kurikulum: Teori dan Praktek. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sulistyo-Basuki. (2013). Pengorganisasian Materi Perpustakaan : Katalogisasi, Klasifikasi, Tajuk Subjek, dan Penjajaran « Sulistyo-Basuki"™s Blog. https://sulistyobasuki.wordpress.com/2013/06/06/pengorganisasian-materi-perpustakaan-katalogisasi-klasifikasi-tajuk-subjek-dan-penjajaran/
Tyagi, S., Sibal, R., Suri, B., Wadhwa, B., & Shekhar, S. (2018). Development of reusable hybrid test automation framework for web based scrum projects. Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 21(3), 455"“462. https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.201809_21(3).0017
Widiasworo, E. (2017). Strategi dan Metode Mengajar Siswa diLuar Kelas. Ar-ruzz Media.
