PERSEPSI PENELITI TENTANG PERPUSTAKAAN BERKELANJUTAN DI LIPI KAWASAN PUSPIPTEK SERPONG (RESEARCHERS PERCEPTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE LIBRARY IN LIPI AREA OF PUSPIPTEK SERPONG)

Yupi Royani, Rahartri Rahartri

Abstract


This study aims to determine the perceptions of the heads of work units and LIPI researchers about the existence and sustainability of libraries in the LIPI Puspiptek Serpong. The study uses descriptive qualitative methods with interview techniques. More in-depth information was collected from the participants, namely the heads of work units and researchers related to the sustainability of the library in the LIPI Puspiptek Serpong. Based on the results and discussions, it was concluded that the library in the LIPI Puspiptek Serpong is still needed both in conventional and digital form because of its function as a repository of knowledge and information sources. As well as its benefits for the community as a place to get information and for researchers to support their research. The library is still needed because as a place to store a collection of books of historical value, management for tacit knowledge (knowledge about research operations) that is not transferred into the finished form such as: books, theses, papers, and as a place of learning for the public. The hope for the LIPI Serpong Library is the realization of an integrated library, where the collections in each work unit are collected into a strategic location. LIPI Serpong library must be able to provide comfort for users.


Keywords


Library, Specialized Library, Researchers

Full Text:

PDF

References


A. Rasul; D. Singh. (2010). The role of academic libraries in facilitating postgraduate students’ research. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 15(3), 75 – 84.

Adeed P. (2019). Ancaman Perpustakaan dan Pustakawan di Tengah Arus Era 4.0. https://siedoo.com/berita-21087-ancaman-perpustakaan-dan-pustakawan-di-tengah-arus-era-4-0/

Barbara DiCicco-Bloom; Benjamin F Crabtree. (2006). The qualitative research interview. Medical Education, 40, 314–321.

Cambride Dictionary. (n.d.). Diakses tanggal 7 April 2020, dari https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/library

Definition of a Library: General Definition. (n.d.). American Library Association. Diakses tanggal 10 Februari 2020, dari https://libguides.ala.org/library-definition

Genevieve Hart; Lynn Kleinveldt. (2011). The role of an academic library in research: researchers’ perspectives at a South African University of Technology. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 77(1), 37–50.

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4f53/637216745fe5ded1ade75b98383ed38e79df.pdf

Hasanah, D. F. (2013). Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Minat Kunjung Pemustaka di Perpustakaan Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gadjah Mada. UIN Sunan Kalijaga, Fakullas Adab dan Ilmu Budaya, Program Studi D3 Perpustakaan dan Informasi Islam.

I Putu Suhartika. (2004). Implementasi Teknologi Informasi sebagai Usaha Peningkatan Mutu Layanan Perpustakaan. Visi Pustaka, 6(2), 15–18.

Mardion, Intan; Rahman, Arif; Yuniarti, R. (2013). Perbaikan Pelayanan Perpustakaan Berdasarkan Integrasi Dimensi Kualitas Jasa dan Pendekatan Perilaku Konsumen (Studi Kasus Perpustakaan Universitas Brawijaya, Malang). Jurnal Rekayasa dan Manajemen Sistem Industri, 1(1), 173–182.

McNamara, C. (1999). General Guidelines for Conducting Interviews, Minnesota.

Meisyaroh, I. (2014). Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Minat Kunjung Pemustaka di Kantor Arsip dan Perpustakaan Kabupaten Klaten. Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga, Fakutlas Adab dan Ilmu Budaya, Program Studi Ilmu Perpustakaan.

Merriam-Webster Dictionary. (n.d.). Diakses tanggal 7 April 2020, dari https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/library?src=search-dict-hed

Profil Pusat Penelitian Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi (Puspiptek). (2020). Kementerian Riset dan Teknologi/Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional. Pusat Penelitian Ilmu Pengetahuan Dan Teknologi (PUSPIPTEK). https://puspiptek.ristekbrin.go.id/profil-kawasan/

Raco, J. R. (2010). Metode penelitian kualitatif: jenis, karakteristik dan Keunggulannya. Grasindo.

Rahartri. (2017). Kajian dan evaluasi pemustaka di unit pelaksana jasa (UPJ) PDII LIPI Serpong, periode tahun 2010-2016.

Rao, K. Nageswara; Babu, K. H. (2001). Role of Librarian in Internet and World Wide Web Environment. Informing Science, 4(1), 25–34.

Rulyah, S. (2006). Meningkatkan Mutu Layanan Perpustakaan dengan Dukungan Teknologi Informasi: Kendala dan Tantangan di UPT Perpustakaan Sriwijaya. Jurnal Kepustakawanan dan Masyarakat Membaca, 22(2), 15–26.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 tahun 2007 tentang Perpustakaan. (2007). http://ppid.perpusnas.go.id/upload/regulasi/094607-UU_No_43_tahun_2007_tentang_Perpustakaan.pdf

Wahyuni, A. (2008). Evaluasi Pengunjung Perpustakaan LAPAN Pusat Periode tahun 2002 sampai tahun 2007. Majalah Sains dan Teknologi Dirgantara, 3(3), 118–131.

Witjaksono, A. (2009). Peningkatan Kualitas Layanan Perpustakaan Perguruan Tinggi Pendekatan Manajemen Mutu Total. Buletin Perpustakaan Universitas Airlangga, 4(1), 20–27.

Your Dictionary. (n.d.). Diakses tanggal 20 Maret 2020, dari https://www.yourdictionary.com/library




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37014/visi%20pustaka.v22i2.958

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 VISI PUSTAKA: Buletin Jaringan Informasi Antar Perpustakaan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Contact person :