PENYEBARLUASAN HASIL-HASIL RISET DI JURNAL ILMIAH BIDANG GEOLOGI KELAUTAN INDONESIA: PENYELIDIKAN KECEPATAN PUBLIKASI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37014/visipustaka.v21i1.75Keywords:
editing speed, publication efficiency, journal quality, bibliometricAbstract
The publication process of National Journal of Marine Geology from the submission to the approval needs to be efficient to speed up the science transfer and new bibliometric indicators in Indonesia. This study aimed to determine the editing speed in Jurnal Geologi Kelautan (Journal of Marine Geology (JGK) and Bulletin of the Marine Geology (BMG) years 2009-2017. The data consisted of 219 articles from JGK and BMG online; recorded publications history, titles, authors, institutions, citations, and pages numbers. Straight counting method was applied to authors and their institutions. Gender analysis was also applied to identify the authors’ sex. Publication history was analyzed by using editing speed norm. Pearson correlation test (p <0.05) was utilized by using IBM SPSS. The editing duration of the two journals was 199.17 days on average. In this context, BMG was considered more efficient. Statistically, citation and editing speed had significant correlation (r = -0.147, p = 0.030). Efficient editing duration performed by collaborative and female writers. Based on the main contributors, the most efficient editor was 129 days. Not only is it useful for journal quality and publication speed, efficient editing duration will increase the authors’ trust toward JGK and BMG. Future researches should be conducted on other national journals in similar fields to provide further analysis or to compare the findings. Keywords: editing speed, publication efficiency, journal quality, bibliometricReferences
Alves-Silva, E., Porto, A. C., Firmino, C., Silva, H. V., Becker, I., Resende, L., . . . Moura, R. (2016). Are the impact factor and other variables related to publishing time in ecology journals?. Scientometrics, 108(3), 1445-1453. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2040-0
Beaver, D. d. (2013). The many faces of collaboration and teamwork in scientific research: Updated reflections on scientific collaboration. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 7(1), 45-54. doi:10.1080/09737766.2013.802629
Bjork, B.-C., & Solomon, D. (2013). The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals. Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 914-923. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2013.09.001
Bruggmann, D., Handl, V., Klingelhofer, D., Jaque, J., & Groneberg, D. A. (2015). Congenital toxoplasmosis: An in-depth density-equalizing mapping analysis to explore its global research architecture. Parasites and Vectors, 8(1),1-13.doi:10.1186/s13071-015-1263-x
Bruggmann, D., Koster, C., Klingelhofer, D., Bauer, J., Ohlendorf, D., Bundschuh, M., & Groneberg, D. A. (2017). Respiratory syncytial virus: A systematic scientometric analysis of the global publication output and the gender distribution of publishing authors. BMJ Open, 7(7), 1-15. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013615
ruggmann, D., Richter, T., Klingelhofer, D., Gerber, A., Bundschuh, M., Jaque, J., & Groneberg, D. A. (2016). Global architecture of gestational diabetes research: Density-equalizing mapping studies and gender analysis. Nutrition Journal, 15(1), 1-12. doi:10.1186/s12937-016-0154-0
Chen, H., Chen, C. H., & Jhanji, V. (2013). Publication times, impact factors, and advance online publication in ophthalmology journals. Ophthalmology, 120(8), 1697-1701.doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.01.044
Elsevier. (2017). Gender in the global research landscape. Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi:https://www.elsevier.com/research- intelligence/campaigns/gender-17
Garg, K. (2016). Publication delay of manuscripts in periodicals published by CSIR-NISCAIR. Current Science, 111(12), 1924-1928. doi:10.18520/cs/v111/i12/1924-1928
Huisman, J., & Smits, J. (2017). Duration and quality of the peer review process: The author"™s perspective. Scientometrics, 113(1), 633-650. doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2310-5
Koster, C., Klingelhofer, D., Groneberg, D. A., & Schwarzer, M. (2016). Rotavirus "“ Global research density equalizing mapping and gender analysis. Vaccine, 34(1), 90-100. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.11.002
Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia. (2014). Kode Etika Publikasi Ilmiah. Peraturan Kepala Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 2014. Jakarta, 18 September 2014. Diakses 20 Maret, 2018, dari http://pusbindiklat.lipi.go.id
Lin, Z., Hou, S., & Wu, J. (2016). The correlation between editorial delay and the ratio of highly cited papers in Nature, Science and Physical Review Letters. Scientometrics, 107(3), 1457-1464. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1936-z
Palese, A. (2017). Researchers"™ time should be protected as much as possible. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 33(5), 927-929. doi:10.1080/03007995.2017.1295031
Palese, A., Coletti, S., & Dante, A. (2013). Publication efficiency among the higher impact factor nursing journals in 2009: A retrospective analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 50(4), 543-551. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.08.019
Shehatta, I., & Mahmood, K. (2016). Correlation among top 100 universities in the major six global rankings: Policy implications. Scientometrics, 109(2), 1231-1254.doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2065-4
Shen, S., Rousseau, R., Wang, D., Zhu, D., Liu, H., & Liu, R. (2015). Editorial delay and its relation to subsequent citations: The journals Nature, Science and Cell. Scientometrics, 105(3), 1867-1873. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1592-8
Shi, D., Rousseau, R., Yang, L., & Li, J. (2017). A journal"s impact factor is influenced by changes in publication delays of citing journals. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(3), 780-789. doi:10.1002/asi.23706
Silva, J. A., & Dobranszki, J. (2017). Excessively long editorial decisions and excessively long publication times by journals: Causes, risks, consequences, and proposed solutions. Publishing Research Quarterly, 33(1), 101-108. doi:10.1007/s12109-016-9489-9
Solomon, D. J., & Bjork, B.-C. (2012). Publication fees in open access publishing: Sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(1), 98-107. doi:10.1002/asi.21660
Terekhov, A. I. (2017). Bibliometric spectroscopy of Russia"™s nanotechnology: 2000-2014. Scientometrics, 110(3), 1217-1242.doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2234-5
Todeschini, R., & Baccini, A. (2016). Handbook of bibliometric indicators: Quantitative tools for studying and evaluating research. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. oi:10.1002/9783527681969.ch10
Toroser, D., Carlson, J., Robinson, M., Gegner, J., Girard, V., Smette, L., . . . O"™Kelly, J. (2017). Factors impacting time to acceptance and publication for peer- reviewed publications. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 33(7), 1183-1189. doi:10.1080/03007995.2016.1271778
Vela, B., Caceres, P., & Cavero, J. M. (2012). Participation of women in software engineering publications. Scientometrics, 93(3), 661-679. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0774-x
Zhang, Z., Zhang, Z., Li, X., & Jiang, M. (2012). Factors influencing Chinese authors" perceptions of journal quality: A comparison between two academic fields. Serials Review, 38(1), 17-23.doi:10.1016/j.serrev.2011.12.002
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
- This statement is the author's commitment to respect copyright, both in terms of citing other people's work and the utilization of journal content. Where necessary, author may send the Manuscript Authenticity Statement and/or the Transfer Copyright Statement that "the work is the original idea of author and has never been sent to another publisher and published in other publication".
- The publication right of the journal is the journal manager property within author's knowledge, and the moral right of publication is the author property.
- The formal legal aspects of journal publication utilizing refer to the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA) license [see also open access policy].
