PROFIL DAN PRODUKTIVITAS PUBLIKASI KARYA ILMIAH INTERNASIONAL CIVITAS PERGURUAN TINGGI DI SCOPUS : STUDI KASUS LIMA BESAR PERGURUAN TINGGI INDONESIA BERDASARKAN PERINGKAT WEBOMETRIC

Authors

  • Rulina Rachmawati Pusat Dokumentasi dan Indormasi Ilmiah, LIPI
  • Tupan Tupan LIPI

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37014/visipustaka.v19i2.53

Keywords:

International Publication, Scopus, Profile, Productivity, Universities, Webometrics

Abstract

Research on profile and productivity  of international scholarly publication indexed by Scopus of top five universities by webometrics (Gadjah Mada University, University of Indonesia, Bandung Institute of Technology, Bogor Agricultural Institute, and Brawijaya University) had been done. Data were collected by searching through Scopus database, using “Indonesia†as keyword on affiliation search and publication of five universities was chosen from 2006-2016. The obtained data were the number of publications per year, the number of publications by fields of research, the authors collaboration between countries, and the authors collaboration between institutions. The top ten research subjects, authors collaboration between countries, and author collaboration between institutions were determined and analyzed by statistics and  descriptive method using microsoft excel and the result displayed in graphs and tables. Results showed that the number of international publications has increased significantly. Bandung Institute of Technology having the most publications and followed consecutively by University of Indonesia, Gadjah Mada University, Bogor Agricultural Institute and Brawijaya University. Research subject illustrated the research trend produced by institutions. Most publications produced by Bandung Institute of Technology were in engineering, while Bogor Agricultural Institute produced mostly in agricultural and biological Sciences. The most collaborating country were Japan, Malaysia, Australia, USA, and Netherland. Collaboration between countries and collaboration between agencies could be motivated by factors such as geographical proximity and numerous advantages which can get form research collaboration.

References

Allik, Juri. 2015. Progress in Estonian science viewed through bibliometric indicators (2004"“2014). Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences, Vol. 64, No. 2: 125"“126.

Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Cherifa, et al. 2015. Relationships between consumption, publication and impact in French universities in a value perspective: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, Vol. 106, No. 1: 263"“280.

Dirjen Dikti. 2014. Pedoman Operasional Penilaian Angka Kredit Kenaikan Pangkat/Jabatan Akademik Dosen. Jakarta.

Gholizadeh, Hossein, et al. 2014. Economic Growth and Internet Usage Impact on Publication Productivity among ASEAN"™s and World"™s Best Universities. Modern Applied Science, Vol. 8, No. 5: 169-178.

Haustein, Stefanie, et al. 2011. Reasons for and developments in international scientific collaboration: does an Asia"“Pacific research area exist from a bibliometric point of view?. Scientometrics, Vol. 86: 727"“746.

Lakitan, Benyamin, dkk. 2012. Scientific productivity and the collaboration intensity of Indonesian universities and public R&D institutions: Are there dependencies on collaborative R&D with foreign institutions?. Technology in Society, Vol. 34: 227-238.

Lang, D.W. 2005. "World Class" or The Curse of Comparison?. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 35, No. 3: 27-55.

Lukman, dkk. 2016. Kekuatan 50 Institusi Ilmiah Indonesia: Profil Publikasi Ilmiah Terindeks Scopus. Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi.

Nguyen, Tuan V., dan Ly T. Pham. 2011. Scientific Output and Its Relationship to Knowledge Economy: An Analysis of ASEAN Countries. Scientometrics, Vol. 89, No. 1: 107"“17.

Hassan, Saeed Ul, et al. 2012. A Bibliometric Study of Research Activity in ASEAN Related to the EU in FP7 Priority Areas. Scientometrics, Vol. 91, No. 3: 1035"“1051.

Payumo, Jane G, dan Taurean C Sutton. 2015. A Bibliometric Assessment of ASEAN "™ S Output , Influence and Collaboration in Plant Biotechnology. Proceedings of ISSI 2015 Istanbul: 15th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, Istanbul, Turkey, 29 June to 3 July, 2015. Di https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3fef/ 74f8f838110c4d2f3fea5 1f2371cb32 68b14.pdf (akses: 12 Januari 2017).

Scopus. 2014. Scopus Journal FAQs: Helping to Improve the Submission & Success Process for Editors & Publishers. Di https://www.elsevier.com/__ data/assets/pdf_file/0006/95118/SC_FAQ-content-selection-process-22092014.pdf (akses: 12 Mei 2016)

Shahbazi-Moghadam, Masoomeh, et al. 2015. Effective Factors for Increasing University Publication and Citation Rate. Asian Social Science, Vol. 11, No. 16: 338-348

Sormin, Remi. 2009. Kajian Korelasi Antara Kolaborasi Peneliti dan Produktivitas Peneliti Lingkup Badan Litbang Pertanian. Jurnal Perpustakaan Pertanian, Vol. 18, No. 1: 1-6

Susanto. 2014. Strategi Menuju World Class University (WCU) Pada Universitas Semarang. Jurnal Transformatika, Vol. 11, No. 2: 87 "“ 95

Tupan dan Wahid Nashihuddin. 2016. Analisis Publikasi Ilmiah Peneliti Lipi Yang Terindeks Di Scopus: Studi Bibliometrik Dengan Vosviewer. Prosiding Lokakarya Nasional Pusat Dokumentasi dan Informasi Ilmiah 2016

Ynalvez, Marcus Antonius dan Wesley M. Shrum. 2011. Professional Networks, Scientific Collaboration, and Publication Productivity in Resource-Constrained Research Institutions In A Developing Country. Research Policy, Vol. 40: 204"“216.

http://www.webometrics.info/ Akses Tanggal 14 Januari 2017

http://peneliti.lipi.go.id/peneliti.cgi Akses Tanggal 14 januari 2017

Downloads

Published

2019-07-04

Issue

Section

Articles