Pengaruh Penguasaan Mata Kuliah Klasifikasi DDC terhadap Kemampuan Menentukan Notasi

Nur Afifah

Abstract


This study aims to determine how the mastery of the DDC classification subject has on the abilities of the students of the 2017-2019 Library Science study program in determining the DDC notation. This study took a sample of 99 students of the Library Science study program at UIN Raden Fatah Palembang in 2017-2019. The type of research used is descriptive quantitative. Methods of data collection in this study in the form of questionnaires and documentation.The data processing technique in this research is to analyze the data using the grand mean formula. The results of the analysis show that the average total score of mastery of DDC classification courses is 0.61 which can be categorized as high because it is in the 0.60-0.80 interval. Meanwhile, the ability to determine notation is also known by performing calculations using the grand mean formula, the results show that the average total value of the ability to determine notation is 0.62 which can be categorized as high because it is in the 0.60-0.80 interval. Furthermore, based on the analysis using simple linear regression, the result of the coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.807 or 80.7% the ability to determine notation is influenced by the mastery of the DDC classification course and based on the results of hypothesis testing that it is known that the hypothesis or H1 is accepted because tcount > ttable (20,113 > 1.66071) which states that there is an influence of mastery of the DDC classification course on the ability to determine notation.


Keywords


influence, mastery, DDC classification course, notation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ade Kohar, dkk. (1993). Panduan Klasifikasi Menggunakan DDC. Jakarta: Pusta Dokumentasi dan Informasi Ilmiah

Ana Retnonongsi, Suharmisi. (2001). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta:Grafindo

Anas, Subdijono. (2001). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Grafindo

Darmono. (2007). Perpustakaan Sekolah: Pendekatan Aspek Manajemen dan Tata Kerja. Jakarta: Grafindo

Herlina. (2007). Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi. Palembang: Raden Fatah Press

Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R& D. Bandung: Alfabeta

Hendriyana, Ricki. (2012). Pengguanaan Sistem Klasifikasi Antara Sistem Klasifikasi The National Technical Information Service dan Dewey Decimal Classification. Visi Pustaka. http://doi.org/10.14421/fhrs.2020.151

Ina, Magdalena. (2015). Taksonomi Bloom-Revisi Kognitif: Kerangka Landasan Untuk Pembelajaran dan Penilain.. Madiun. e-journal FIP IKIP PGRI

Munar, Zaitun. (2011). Pengaruh Pemberian Reward Terhadap Kinerja Pustakawan Badan Arsip dan Perpustakaan Aceh. Banda Aceh

Rasnawati. (2016). Analisis Sistem Pengklasifikasian Koleksi di Perpustakaan Ibnu Rusyd Pesantren Modern Pendidikan Al-Qur’an IMMIM Putra Makassar. UIN Alauddin Makasar. e-jornal Alauddin Makassar

Syahraeni. (2016). Analisis Tingkat Pemahaman Mahasiswa Jurusan Ilmu Perpustakaan UIN Aluddin Makassar Terhadap Sistem Klasifikasi DDC. UIN Alauddin Makassar. e-jornal Alauddin Makassar

Effendy. Ilmu Komunikasi Teori dan Praktek. Retrieved March 29, 2020, from http://manfaat-dan-tujuan-teori//

Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Retrieval March 9, 2020, from http://kbbi.web.id//

Perpustakaan RI. Standar Nasional Perpustakaan (SNP). (n.d). Retrieval March 29, 2020, from http://perpusnas.go.id//standar-nasional-perpustakaan//.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37014/visipustaka.v23i3.2736

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 VISI PUSTAKA: Buletin Jaringan Informasi Antar Perpustakaan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Address :


Contact person : 

WA Number

081327669994 PURNOMO