Analisis Usabilty Antarmuka Halaman Kerja (Back Office) SLiMS Versi 8 Akasia Menggunakan Nielsen’s Attributes of Usability

Safira Almaida, Danang Dwijo Kangko, Wardiyono Wardiyono

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to measure and analyze usability evaluation on the SLiMS Version 8 Akasia work page interface using the Nilsen's Attributes of Usability questionnaire method which consists of 5 indicators, namely Learnibility (easy to learn), Efficiency (efficient), Memorability (easy to remember), Error (failure), and Satisfaction (satisfaction). This type of research is descriptive with a quantitative approach. The limit of this study only discusses the usability level of the SLiMS 8 Akasia back office interface, not only on other interface pages in the SLiMS Version 8 Akasia application. The samples chosen were staff or librarians who were accustomed to using the SLiMS Version 8 Akasia application to support their daily work. The results of tabulation and analysis of respondent data stated their agreement on each indicator statement of Learnibility, Efficiency, Memorability, and Satisfaction. Meanwhile, respondents stated that the answer was neutral on the Error indicator


Keywords


SLiMS, Back Office, Usability, Nilsen’s Attributes of Usability.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian Kuantitatif. Bumi Aksara.

Aziza, R. F. A. (2019). Analisa Usability Desain User Interface Pada Website Tokopedia Menggunakan Metode Heuristics Evaluation. Jurnal Tekno Kompak, 13(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.33365/jtk.v13i1.265

Azwar, M. (2013). Membangun Sistem Otomasi Perpustakaan dengan Senayan Library Management System (SLiMS). Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan & Informasi KHIZANAH AL-HIKMAH, 1(1), 19–33. http://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/khizanah-al-hikmah/article/view/23

Basuki, S. (1991). Pengantar Ilmu Prpustakaan (2nd ed.). Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Basuki, S. (1994). Periodesasi Perpustakaan Indonesia. Bandung Remaja Rosdakarya.

Chandra, R., & Guntupalli, C. (2008). User interface design: methods and qualities of a good user interface design. 37. www.hv.se

Comunity, S. D. (2020). Daftar Pengguna SLIMS. https://SLiMS.web.id/web/news/daftar-pengguna-SLiMS/

Darmawan, R. (2013). Pengalaman, Usability, dan Antarmuka Grafis: Sebuah Penelusuran Teoritis. ITB Journal of Visual Art and Design, 4(2), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.5614/itbj.vad.2013.4.2.1

Daryono. (2016). Otomatisasi Perpustakaan. Teknologi, 1–21.

Dewi, A. O. P. (2019). Memilih Software Otomasi Perpustakaan Sesuai 0Kebutuhan Perpustakaan. Anuva, 3(1), 71–76.

International Organization of Standardization. (n.d.). ISO 9241-11:2018 Ergonomics of human-system interaction — Part 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts.

Kangko, D. D. (2018). Perancangan ulang antarmuka katalog daring SLiMS di Perpustakaan Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana.

LaxmanPendit, P. (2008). Perpustakaan Digital dari A sampai Z. Citra Kami.

Lohse, S. P., & L, G. (1999). Internet retail store design: How the user interface influences traffic and sales. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 5(2).

Madan, A., & Dubey, S. K. (2012). Usability Evaluation Methods: a Literature Review. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 4(02), 590–599.

Nielsen, J. (n.d.). Introduction to Usability. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-101-introduction-to-usability/

Nielsen, J. (2020). User Interface. Nielsen Norman Group. https://www.nngroup.com/courses/hci/

Nusantara, U. B. (2020). Sistem Informasi. http://library.binus.ac.id/eColls/eThesisdoc/Bab2HTML/2007200149IFBab2/body.html

Paramitha, K. S. (2017). Evaluasi Usability Pada Desain Website Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember 2017 Dengan Metode Eye Tracking Berdasarkan Nielsen Model Dan Kuesioner Nielsen Attributtes of Usability ( Nau ) Usability Evaluation Design of Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember. 167.

Ridho, M. R. (2018). Senayan Library Management System for dummies. Jurnal Maju Mundur, 2(3), 1–10. http://SLiMS.web.id

Rohana, & Adryawin, I. (2019). FIVE LAWS OF LIBRARY SCIENCE : SEBUAH PEMIKIRAN YANG DINAMIS DARI RANGANATHAN Jurusan Ilmu Perpustakaan , Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram. III(1), 1–7.

Sugiyono. (2010). Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Alfabeta.

Wiratna Sujarweni V. (2014). SPSS Untuk Penelitian. Pustaka Baru Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37014/visipustaka.v24i1.1123

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 VISI PUSTAKA: Buletin Jaringan Informasi Antar Perpustakaan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Address :


Contact person : 

WA Number

081327669994 ( Purnomo )

081223541993 ( Syifa )